It reads the scheme, not the topic.
M, A and B marks do different jobs. Markly checks your working against the points as written - method marks survive an arithmetic slip, accuracy marks don't.
Paste the question, the mark scheme and your working. Markly awards each point the way an examiner would - then explains, in plain English, the ones you dropped.
Ten marks free with an account. The finder and focus timer never expire. No card either way.
Squared both sides: 4(2x − a)² < (x + 3a)² Awarded - squaring is a valid way to clear the modulus here, because both sides are non-negative.
Simplified to 15x² − 22ax − 5a² < 0 Awarded - expansion and collection are both correct.
Final answer given as x < 5a/3 Dropped - only the upper bound. The factorised form also gives −a/5 < x, so the solution is an interval.
Wrote ≤ in the final line Dropped - the question uses a strict inequality, so the endpoints are not included.
The paper comes backNine out of fourteen.
A number in a circle, and nothing beside it.
Five marks went somewhere. Nobody says where.
So you revise the whole topic again - including the half you already had right.
Five dropped marks. No margin note, no next step, no way to tell a slip from a misunderstanding.
A free account and you're in. No PDFs to dig through. Just the question, the scheme, and what you actually wrote.
Solve 2|2x − a| < |x + 3a|, a > 0.
M1 squares both sides · A1 15x² − 22ax − 5a² < 0 · A1 −a/5 < x < 5a/3 · B1 strict inequality
4(2x−a)² < (x+3a)² → 15x² − 22ax − 5a² < 0 → x ≤ 5a/3
Valid method to remove the modulusSquaring both sides is accepted here.
Correct three-term quadratic15x² − 22ax − 5a² < 0.
Lower bound missingThe scheme needs both critical values, −a/5 and 5a/3.
Wrong inequality sign≤ instead of < loses the accuracy mark.
why do I need the second bound as well?
Because the quadratic opens upwards, 15x² − 22ax − 5a² is only negative between its roots. Factorising gives (5x + a)(3x − 5a) < 0, so x sits strictly between −a/5 and 5a/3. A one-sided answer describes a ray, not an interval - which is why the scheme splits this into two accuracy marks.
Question, mark scheme, your working. Type it out, photograph a handwritten page, or drop in the PDF straight from the paper. Nothing gets retyped.
Each mark scheme point is checked off against what you wrote, with the reason attached to it. You get a mark out of the total and a line-by-line reason - not a grade and a shrug.
Select any line of the analysis and ask a follow-up. The tutor still has the question, the scheme and your working in front of it, so you never re-explain yourself.
An examiner doesn't grade the topic. They walk the scheme, point by point, and decide whether your page earns each one. Markly does the same walk - and writes down the reason it reached for.
Valid method to find actual size from the scale bar
AwardedMeasured flower-head diameter recorded correctly
AwardedFinal answer given in mm instead of the required μm
DroppedConversion step not shown in the working
DroppedCommand words, assessment objectives, and the conventions examiners hold you to. Three things the engine is made of.
M, A and B marks do different jobs. Markly checks your working against the points as written - method marks survive an arithmetic slip, accuracy marks don't.
Every line of algebra typeset properly and broken into steps, so the explanation reads like a worked solution instead of one collapsed final answer.
Handwritten pages and scanned past papers go in as they are. Point a camera at the page, drop the file, and the working is read off it.
Every question you get marked feeds a deck built from your mistakes, a check that you actually understood it, and a map of which topics are still soft.
Context carries over from the mark, so follow-ups pick up mid-thought instead of starting from scratch.
Cards are written from the marks you missed, not from the syllabus, and scheduled Anki-style so they come back before you forget.
One targeted question on the exact idea you dropped a mark for. Recognising the answer isn't the same as being able to produce it.
Scored per topic, not per subject, so "Maths 68%" becomes something you can actually act on this evening.
One price, everything unlocked. No per-question charges, no credit packs, no annual lock-in.
Unlimited marking across all nine subjects. Cancel from the app in two clicks - the 10 free marks, the past paper finder and the focus timer stay free either way.
No card required to try it.
An email address, nothing else. See exactly what Markly does before you pay for anything - and your marks, flashcards and progress save from here.
Search the past paper index and run focus blocks as often as you like. Unmetered, with or without a subscription.
Every feature, every subject, one monthly price. Cancel whenever you're done with exams.
Bring the last question you got back with marks missing. It takes about a minute to find out what the examiner was looking for.